1,2-Migration of 2‘-Oxoalkyl Group and Concomitant Synthesis of 2-<i>C</i>-Branched <i>O</i>-, <i>S</i>-Glycosides and Glycosyl Azides via 1,2-Cyclopropanated Sugars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment of 2'-oxoalkyl 2-O-Ms(Ts)-alpha-C-mannosides (4, 5, and 6) with base resulted in 1,2-cyclopropanation via an intramolecular SN2 reaction due to their 1,2-trans-diaxial configurations. The 1,2-cyclopropanated sugars (10 and 13) were reacted with various alcohols, thiols, and sodium azide to produce 2-C-branched O- and S-glycosides and glycosyl azides (11, 14-28) in good to excellent yields. In contrast, 1,2-cis 2'-oxoalkyl 2-O-Ms(Ts)-alpha-C-glucoside 9 formed an acyclic conjugated aldehyde (31) under basic conditions, which occurred by 1'-enolation followed by beta-elimination. An intramolecular Michael addition from 31 produced 2-O-Ms-beta-C-glucoside 30 as a major product. However, due to the electron-withdrawing effect exerted by 2-O-Ms compound 31 also undergoes a C2 epimerization to form 32. Thereafter, the intramolecular Michael addition led to the formation of both 1,2-trans 2'-oxoalkyl 2-O-Ms-alpha-C-mannoside 4 and its beta-anomer (33). Because beta-elimination/Michael addition and C2 epimerization are reversible reactions, equilibriums among 9, 31, 30, 32, 33, and 4 were established, which included the transformation of 1,2-cis C-glucoside 9 into 1,2-trans C-mannoside 4. The subsequent 1,2-cyclopropanation of 4 was an irreversible reaction yielding 1,2-cyclopropanated 10 and further conversion to 1,2-migration products (11 and 12).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".