MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 18264: Heart Rate Variability Predicts Mental Stress Ischemia in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

2015· article· en· W2952279288 on OpenAlexaff
Amit Shah, Arshed A. Quyyumi, Michael Kutner, J. Douglas Bremner, Ernest Garcia, Jonathon A. Nye, Kobina Wilmot, Ibhar Al Mheid, Ayman Alkhoder, Nino Isakadze, Malik Obideen, Naser Abdelhadi, Brad D. Pearce, Qi Long, Rachel Lampert, Paolo Raggi, Viola Vaccarino

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart rate variabilityCardiologyInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseIschemiaHeart rateAmbulatoryConfoundingStressorBlood pressurePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Mental stress ischemia (MSI) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes and death in CAD patients, but little is known about the mechanisms behind this phenomenon. We hypothesized that alterations in autonomic function before, during, or after mental stress may play a role. We examined whether MSI positive patients with CAD have reduced parasympathetic (PNS) tone, as measured by high frequency heart rate variability (HF HRV), as well as reduced baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS), as approximated by low frequency (LF) HRV at baseline, peak mental stress, and recovery. Methods: A mental stress test with a standardized speech stressor was performed in 425 CAD patients wearing an ambulatory ECG monitor. Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed with TC-99m Sestamibi. After careful editing for artifacts and ectopic beats, HF HRV and LF HRV were measured for 5-min periods during a baseline rest period, 5 min of speech, and 5 min of recovery. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. Results: The mean (SD) age was 63 (9) years, 26% were women, and 30% were African American; 42 (10%) patients developed MSI. Compared with MSI negative, MSI positive patients had lower HF HRV and LF HRV during rest, stress, and recovery. The largest difference was observed during stress; HF HRV was 46% lower (p=0.01), and LF HRV was 44% lower (p=0.01). When examining reactivity to stress (difference between stress and rest), only LF HRV was significantly different between groups, such that MSI positive patients had an average 32% reduction in LF HRV with stress, while MSI negative patients had an average 3% increase (p=0.04). LF HRV reactivity remained an independent predictor of MSI (p=0.01) in models adjusting for sociodemographics, traditional risk factors, antidepressants, beta-blocker use, revascularization history, heart failure, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and heart rate/blood pressure reactivity. Conclusions: Autonomic factors, most notably reduced LF HRV reactivity, predict MSI in CAD patients. This implies reduced BRS and autonomic inflexibility as an important pathophysiological component of the ischemic response to mental stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207