MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952317573 · doi:10.1101/248765

Luminal MCF-12A and myoepithelial-like Hs 578Bst cells form bilayered acini similar to human breast

2018· preprint· en· W2952317573 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Weber-Ouellette, Mélanie Busby, Isabelle Plante

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyoepithelial cellMatrigelAcinusIn vitroCell cultureConfocalCell biologyEpitheliumCellCell typeConfocal microscopyMaterials scienceAnatomyChemistryBiophysicsPathologyBiologyEndocrinologyMedicineBiochemistryImmunohistochemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2.3.1 Abstract The mammary gland is a complex organ, structured in a ramified epithelium supported by the stroma. The epithelium’s functional unit is the bilayered acinus, made of a layer of luminal cells surrounded by a layer of basal cells mainly composed of myoepithelial cells. The aim of this study was to develop a reproducible and manipulable three-dimensional co-culture model of the bilayered acinus in vitro to study the interactions between the two layers. Two different combinations of cell lines were co-cultured in Matrigel: SCp2 and SCg6 mice cells, or MCF-12A and Hs 578Bst human cell lines. Cell ratios and Matrigel concentration were optimized. The resulting acini were analysed by confocal microscopy using epithelial (E-cadherin) and myoepithelial (α-smooth muscle actin) markers. SCp2 and SCg6 cells formed distinct three-dimensional structures, whereas MCF-12A and Hs 578Bst cells formed some bilayered acini. This in vitro bilayered acini model will allow us to understand the role of interactions between luminal and myoepithelial cells in the normal breast development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207