MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952398255 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz048.p11-114-19

Oral Nutritional Supplementation in Picky Eating Children (P11-114-19)

2019· article· en· W2952398255 on OpenAlexaff
Deepti Khanna, Menaka Yalawar, Gaurav Verma, Geraldine Baggs, A. A. Devitt, C. Bhavya, Shrish Bhatnagar, Apurba Ghosh, Pramod Jog, Anuradha Khadilkar, Bala Kishore, Anil Kumar, Prahalad D. Pote, MD Ravi, Sandip Shinde, Atish Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMicronutrientPalatabilityWeight lossPediatricsAppetiteWeight changeOverweightAnimal scienceBody mass indexInternal medicineDemographyObesityBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This was a multicenter prospective randomized double-blind study with two parallel experimental groups (EXP GRPS) & an open-labeled control grp (CON). Objective was to investigate the effect of two oral nutritional supplements (ONS) along with dietary counseling (DC) vs DC alone on growth among picky eating children from India, aged > 24 m to ≤ 48 m over 90 days. Study recruited 321 children [n = 107/grp] in ages mentioned above from urban/semi-urban India with a weight-for-height between 3rd–15th centile (WHO 2006) and picky eating behaviors. Subjects in the 2 EXP GRPS received a daily supplement of one of the two similar ONS [Pediasure (PDS) & Pediasure Advance (PDS Adv)} along with DC for 90 days, whereas subjects in CON received only DC. Children in both EXP GRPS consumed min of 1 & max to 2 servings of ONS/day & there were 5 study visits (Day 1, 7, 30, 60, 90). Primary variable was the change in WHO weight-for-height centile from Day 1 to 90. Secondary variables included change in weight-for-age, height-for-age, BMI-for-age, MUAC-for-age, average intake of energy, macros & micronutrients (using 24 hr. dietary recall) and change in appetite & palatability score. Post 90 days, both EXP GRPS had significantly higher change in growth parameters like weight-for-height centile (P = 0.0086), BMI-for-age centile (P = 0.0214 & P = 0.0203 for PDS & PDS Adv respectively) & weight-for-age centile (P = 0.0054) as compared to CON. PDS group reported a significant improvement in MUAC-for-age centile (P = 0.0241) vs CON post 90-days. Significant improvement in appetite score was reported by EXP GRPS (P = 0.0067 & P = 0.0245 for PDS & PDS Adv) vs CON. Significant improvement in avg. intake of energy, protein, fat, calcium, iron, vit C & thiamine was observed for EXP GRPS vs CON for all visit days except day1. Nutrient & energy intakes at baseline were lower than RDA’s but ONS helped to fill the nutritional gaps at end of 90 days. There were no significant differences observed in the height-for-age and palatability score. ONS’s formulated with macro & micronutrients along with DC are more efficacious in catch up growth vs DC alone post 90 days supplementation. Abbott Nutrition has funded this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207