MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952496990 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1403.1982

On multiserver retrial queues: history, Okubo-type hypergeometric systems and matrix continued-fractions

2014· preprint· en· W2952496990 on OpenAlexaff
Florin Avram, Daniel Matei, Yiqiang Q. Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersAcademia Româna
KeywordsMathematicsGenerating functionApplied mathematicsHypergeometric functionHypergeometric distributionSingularityTaylor seriesMatrix (chemical analysis)Markov chainPure mathematicsMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study two families of QBD processes with linear rates: (A) the multiserver retrial queue and its easier relative; and (B) the multiserver M/M/infinity Markov modulated queue. The linear rates imply that the stationary probabilities satisfy a recurrence with linear coefficients; as known from previous work, they yield a ``minimal/non-dominant" solution of this recurrence, which may be computed numerically by matrix continued-fraction methods. Furthermore, the generating function of the stationary probabilities satisfies a linear differential system with polynomial coefficients, which calls for the venerable but still developing theory of holonomic (or D-finite) linear differential systems. We provide a differential system for our generating function that unifies problems (A) and (B), and we also include some additional features and observe that in at least one particular case we get a special ``Okubo-type hypergeometric system", a family that recently spurred considerable interest. The differential system should allow further study of the Taylor coefficients of the expansion of the generating function at three points of interest: 1) the irregular singularity at 0; 2) the dominant regular singularity, which yields asymptotic series via classic methods like the Frobenius vector expansion; and 3) the point 1, whose Taylor series coefficients are the factorial moments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207