A series of 1‐[2‐aryl‐1‐diazenyl]‐3‐({3‐[2‐aryl‐1‐diazenyl]perhydrobenzo[<i>d</i>]imidazol‐1‐yl}methyl)perhydrobenzo[<i>d</i>]imidazoles. Synthesis and characterization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract magnified image Reaction of diazonium salts with solutions of 1,2‐diaminocyclohexane mixed with formaldehyde affords the 1‐[2‐aryl‐1‐diazenyl]‐3‐({3‐[2‐aryl‐1‐diazenyl]perhydrobenzo[d]imidazol‐1‐yl}methyl)perhydrobenzo‐[d]imidazoles (6), a new series of bis‐triazenes with different connectivity than any previous type of bis‐triazene reported. The products have been characterized principally by NMR and IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and unequivocally by X‐ray crystallography. The methylene protons of the perhydroimidazole rings are diastereotopic giving rise to a doublet of doublets pattern in the 1H NMR spectra. However, detailed analysis of the NMR spectra shows that there is more than one set of doublet‐of‐doublet signals, suggesting the presence of different rotameric forms of the products. The 13C NMR spectral assignments were assisted by COSY and DEPT experiments with selected compounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".