The circular RNA circ-Ccnb1 dissociates Ccnb1/Cdk1 complex suppressing cell invasion and tumorigenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Circular RNAs represent a large class of non-coding RNAs that are extensively expressed in mammals. However, the functions of circular RNAs are largely unknown. We recently reported that the circular RNA circ-Ccnb1 could bind with H2AX in p53 mutant cells and suppressed mutant p53 in tumor progression. Here we found that circ-Ccnb1 could interact with both Ccnb1 and Cdk1 proteins. Normally, Ccnb1 and Cdk1 proteins form a complex, allowing Ccnb1 to function as an all-or-none switch for cell mitosis. The interaction of circ-Ccnb1 with Ccnb1 and Cdk1 proteins dissociated the formation of Ccnb1-Cdk1 complex, by forming a large complex containing circ-Ccnb1, Ccnb1 and Cdk1. Formation of this large complex may occur in cytosol and nuclei, and Ccnb1 loses its roles in enhancing cell migration, invasion, proliferation and survival. In vivo, ectopic delivery of circ-Ccnb1 inhibited tumor growth and extended mouse viability. These results have added another layer of mechanisms for circ-Ccnb1 to regulate tumor progression in vitro and in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".