Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of Some New 4-Amino-3- (p-methoxybenzyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-5-one Derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract 4-Amino-3-p-methoxybenzyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl-acetic acid ethyl ester (2) was prepared from 4-amino-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazole-5-one (1) and ethyl bromoacetate. Compound 3 was synthesized by the condensation of 2 with hydrazine hydrate. The treatment of compound 3 with various aromatic aldehydes resulted in the formation of arylidene hydrazides as cistrans conformers 4a - g. Thiosemicarbazide derivative 5 was prepared by the reaction of compound 3 with phenylisothiocyanate. Cyclization of 5 with sodium hydroxide resulted in the formation of compound 6. Treatment of 6 with benzyl bromide gave compound 7. Four of the newly synthesized compounds were screened for their anticancer activity against a panel of 60 cell lines derived from nine cancer types, namely, non-small cell lung, colon, breast, ovarian, leukemia, renal, melanoma, prostate and CNS cancers at a fixed dose of 10 μM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".