Direct Measurement of Acid Dissociation Constants of Trace Organic Compounds at Nanomolar Levels in Aqueous Solution by Condensed Phase–Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We report the use of condensed phase–membrane introduction mass spectrometry as a novel method for the determination of acid dissociation constants for hydrophobic organic acids in aqueous solution at nanomolar concentrations. The technique is based on the pH-dependent permeation of analytes through a semipermeable polydimethylsiloxane membrane probe that is immersed directly in aqueous samples. We describe the method and report the dissociation constant (pKa) values for compounds of biological and environmental relevance, including contaminants, pharmaceuticals, and naphthenic acids. The approach can be applied to individual compounds, combined suites, and complex mixtures at parts-per-billion levels. We report pKa values for 10 carboxylic acids with precision estimates and relative errors (where reliable literature values are available) of <0.1 log units. We report acidity constants for 2-methyl-3-methoxy-4-phenyl butanoic acid (a biomarker for microcystin algal toxins) and 4-t-butylcyclohexane carboxylic acid (a model naphthenic acid) as 4.28 ± 0.03 and 5.15 ± 0.05, respectively. Furthermore, we employ this approach to measure the effect of both temperature and deuterium oxide (heavy water) on acid dissociation, reporting the enthalpy and entropy changes for the ionization of a representative carboxylic acid and substituted phenol. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1879–1889. © 2019 SETAC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".