MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952814824 · doi:10.1021/cm052623n

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Rare-Earth Filled Skutterudites LaFe<sub>4</sub>P<sub>12</sub> and CeFe<sub>4</sub>P<sub>12</sub>

2006· article· en· W2952814824 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew P. Grosvenor, Ronald G. Cavell, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyCeriumSpectral lineValence (chemistry)Electronic structureMaterials scienceSpectroscopyBinding energyValence bandElectronic band structureElectron spectroscopyBand gapAtomic physicsCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryCondensed matter physicsPhysicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure of the rare-earth filled skutterudites LaFe 4 P 12 and CeFe 4 P 12 was examined by high-resolution core-line and valence-band X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). From analysis of the binding energies and line shapes in the core-line spectra, the formulations (La 3+ )(Fe 2+ ) 4 (P - ) 12 and (Ce 3+ )(Fe 2+ ) 4 (P - ) 12 were obtained, with the electron deficiency being represented by a hole in the valence band. The occurrence of trivalent cerium was confirmed by the presence of a partially filled 4f state found in the valence band spectrum of CeFe 4 P 12 but not in LaFe 4 P 12 . The valence band spectra agree well with the density of states determined from band structure calculations. These spectra were fitted through a simple model in which component peaks are related to electron populations. Such an analysis gives atomic charges that are consistent with the formulations derived from the core-line spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207