New 1,3-dihydroazepin-2-one derivatives by [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of suitably substituted 2-alkenylcyclopropyl isocyanates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2-siloxysubstituted 2-alkenylcyclopropanecarboxylic acids 1014 were converted into the corresponding carbonyl azides by treatment with DPPA (diphenyl phosphorazidate) and triethylamine. On heating to 80 °C these intermediates smoothly furnished azepinone derivatives 1925 in moderate to good overall yields, which are the result of a sequence of Curtius reaction to cyclopropylisocyanates, [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement, and a final proton shift. The primary products may undergo desilylation (to afford azepin-2,5-diones such as 23) or double bond migration (to compound 25). Cyclopropanecarboxylic acids cis-32, cis-34, and cis-35, which bear no 2-siloxy group, similarly provided azepinone derivatives 3638 in good yields. No influence of the 2-siloxy substituent on the reaction course and rates could be observed in these qualitative studies, which was confirmed by DFT calculations with model compounds 3942 showing similar reaction barriers for rearrangements of cyclopropylisocyanates with or without a 2-hydroxy group.Key words: vinyl cyclopropanes, carbonylazides, [3.3]-sigmatropic rearrangements, azepinones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".