Rare‐Earth Tetrel Antimonides <i>RE</i><sub>5</sub><i>Tt<sub>x</sub></i>Sb<sub>3–<i>x</i></sub> (<i>RE</i> = La–Nd; <i>Tt</i> = Si, Ge)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ternary rare‐earth tetrel antimonides RE 5 Tt x Sb 3– x ( RE = La–Nd; Tt = Si, Ge) have been prepared by arc‐melting of the elements and annealing at 800 °C. Their crystal structures were determined by single‐crystal and powder X‐ray diffraction methods. These ternary antimonides adopt a structure (β‐Yb 5 Sb 3 ‐type, orthorhombic, space group Pnma , Z = 4) that is different from those of the parent binary phases RE 5 Sb 3 (Mn 5 Si 3 ‐type), RE 5 Si 3 (Cr 5 B 3 ‐type), or RE 5 Ge 3 (Mn 5 Si 3 ‐type) for RE = La–Nd. The range of solid solubility determined for a representative series, La 5 Ge x Sb 3– x , is relatively wide, 0.9 ≤ x ≤ 1.6. The disorder arises largely from the partial substitution of Tt atoms into Sb sites centred within RE 6 trigonal prisms. Columns of confacial RE 6 trigonal prisms are connected to each other through edge‐sharing to form a three‐dimensional framework outlining hexagonal channels filled by ribbons of [ RE 2 Tt 2 ] rhombs. Band‐structure calculations provided support for these site preferences and the range of solid solubility in La 5 Ge x Sb 3– x , which can be related largely to changes in the heteroatomic La–Ge and La–Sb bonding interactions. Magnetic measurements on RE 5 Tt x Sb 3– x ( RE = La, Pr, Nd) revealed Pauli paramagnetic behaviour for the La members and multiple low‐temperature transitions (likely involving ferromagnetic ordering) for the Pr and Nd members. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2009)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".