MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952992647

A study of the facilitating and hindering factors in the comprehension and use of information about children and toddlers' oral health for parents and caregivers

2019· article· en· W2952992647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Moreira Av, Wilson Galhego-Garcia, Zanchetta Ms

Bibliographic record

VenueARCHIVES OF HEALTH INVESTIGATION · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Health and Care Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionFocus groupPromotion (chess)PopulationHealth promotionMedical educationComprehensionMedicineQualitative researchHygieneNursingPsychologyFamily medicinePublic healthEnvironmental healthSociologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research will analyze the social impact of Feliz, an oral health promotion program developed in the city of Birigui, in the state of Sao Paulo. This program engages dentistry students in educating primary caregivers on the proper oral hygiene practices for children between four months and seven years of age. The research focus is on understanding the participation of primary caregivers, mainly mothers, in this initiative. The design is impact evaluation (Rossi, Lips ey, & Freeman, 2004) using a qualitative descriptive approach (Creswell, 2013). The methods are individual interviews and focus groups with 40 to 70 parents and educators of children who attend local daycare centers (Centros de Educacao Infantil). Interviews will be conducted at the daycare centers. The goal is to learn more about what are the main benefits and barriers perceived by them while trying to apply what they have learned through the Sorriso Feliz initiative, in the home. Results will be analyzed qualitatively. The theoretical framework is the Population Health Promotion (PHP) mode l, developed by Health Canada (Hamilton & Bhatti, 1996). This three-dimensional model looks at the interaction between determinants of population health, levels of potential interventions, and major actions for health promotion (Hamilton & Bhatti, 1996). The expected outcome is the understa nding and outlining of factors that support or make it difficult for caregivers to routinely engage children in oral hygiene practices. Preliminary dissemination of findings will be at local level with presentations to professional and lay audiences. Future final dissemination of the results will include, but is not limited to, submission of abstracts for national and international conferences, and production of presentation materials for strategic audiences. This research can potentially inspire further investigations within the subject of oral health promotion strategies aimed at school-aged children, both in Canada and Brazil. This study has been approved by both Ryerson University's and UNESP's Ethics Boards. Descriptors: Oral Health; Children; Todler.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCHIVES OF HEALTH INVESTIGATIONSame topicDental Health and Care UtilizationFrench-language works237,207