The Photochemistry of 2-(1-Naphthyl)ethyl Benzoates: Cycloaddition and Intramolecular Exciplex Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photochemistry of the 2-(1-naphthyl)ethyl benzoates 6 and 7 was examined in order to compare them to previously studied 2-arylethyl 4-cyanobenzoates that underwent a Norrish Type II fragmentation. The 1-naphthyl group was incorporated to provide a fluorescent chromophore for probing the intramolecular electron transfer proposed previously for the mechanism. The naphthalene fluorescence was quenched for both 6 and 7 although at very different rates. For 6, with the higher thermodynamic driving force (-68.9 kJ/mol), intramolecular electron transfer was fast in all solvents, independent of their polarity (cyclohexane to methanol). For 7, with the lower driving force (-26.5 kJ/mol) the process was fast only in polar solvents. Exciplex emission, observed for 6 (but not for 7), exhibited a large solvatochromic effect possibly indicating a high dipole moment (28 D) in polar solvents (stretched conformation) but a lower one (17 D) in nonpolar solvents (folded conformation). Finally, the 4-cyanobenzoate 6 was very unreactive photochemically. In contrast, benzoate 7 underwent a 2 + 2 cycloaddition of the ester carbonyl to the naphthalene ring to give products 8 and 9, a process for which we have found no precedent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".