MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PS962 PHASE 1 RESULTS OF ZUMA‐4: KTE‐X19, AN ANTI‐CD19 CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR T CELL THERAPY, IN PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY B CELL ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA

2019· article· en· W2953077540 on OpenAlexaff
Alan S. Wayne, Van Huynh, Nobuko Hijiya, Rayne H. Rouce, Patrick A. Brown, Joerg Krueger, Michael Rytting, Carrie L. Kitko, Edward Ziga, Michelle L. Hermiston, Morgan K. Richards, André Baruchel, Tong Shen, Lovely Goyal, Remus Vezan, Richa Jain, D.W. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyBone marrowAcute lymphocytic leukemiaInternal medicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationImmunologyLeukemiaLymphoblastic LeukemiaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Please indicate where the abstract has been published before: This abstract has also been submitted to ASPHO 2019 Background: KTE‐X19, formerly KTE‐C19, is an autologous anti‐CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. Early clinical experience with KTE‐X19 in children and adolescents with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is promising. Here, we present end of Phase 1 results from ZUMA‐4. Aims: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of KTE‐X19 in pediatric and adolescent patients with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Methods: In this dose‐finding study, patients aged 2–21 years with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Philadelphia chromosome‐positive allowed) and > 5% bone marrow blasts received either 2 or 1 × 10 6 chimeric antigen receptor T cells/kg following conditioning chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was incidence of dose‐limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints included complete remission (CR) rate (CR and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CR + CRi]) and overall survival. KTE‐X19 formulation was optimized in a second 1 × 10 6 dose group using a lower infusion volume (40‐mL versus 68‐mL). Results: As of October 11, 2018, 24 patients received KTE‐X19 (median age of 13 years [range, 3–20 years]; 42% ≥ 3 prior regimens; 29% primary refractory disease; 25% relapsed/refractory post‐allogeneic stem cell transplantation; 37% [range, 0%–100%], median preconditioning bone marrow blast count). The median follow‐up was 13.2 months. Four patients received a targeted 2 × 10 6 cells/kg with no dose limiting toxicities in evaluable patients (n = 3). Patients were then enrolled at a targeted 1 × 10 6 cells/kg to improve the overall safety profile: 11 received the 68‐mL formulation, and 9 received the 40‐mL. Overall, the most common Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were hypotension (50%) and anemia (33%). Rates of Grade ≥ 3 neurologic events were 25%, 36%, and 11% in the 2 × 10 6 , 1 × 10 6 (68‐mL), and 1 × 10 6 (40‐mL) groups, respectively, and rates of Grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome were 75%, 18%, and 22%. Overall, there were 3 Grade 5 adverse events that were unrelated to KTE‐X19. All but 2 patients in the 40‐mL, 1 × 10 6 group were evaluable for efficacy with ≥ 2 months of follow‐up. The CR + CRi rate was 100%, 64%, and 71% in the 2 × 10 6 , 1 × 10 6 (68‐mL), and 1 × 10 6 (40‐mL) groups, respectively, with 25%, 71%, and 100% of CR + CRi patients in ongoing response as of the data cutoff; and 75%, 73%, and 86% of all patients had undetectable minimal residual disease. Median overall survival was not reached for either 1 × 10 6 group and was 8 months for the 2 × 10 6 group. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell expansion was observed in all dose/formulation groups. Summary/Conclusion: Children and adolescents with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia achieved high minimal residual disease‐negative remission rates with a manageable safety profile and promising efficacy after a single dose of KTE‐X19. Phase 2 of ZUMA‐4 is ongoing at the 40‐mL, 1 × 10 6 cells/kg dose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207