MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953090215 · doi:10.1039/c9cp02815c

The water–carbon monoxide dimer: new infrared spectra, <i>ab initio</i> rovibrational energy level calculations, and an interesting in-termolecular mode

2019· article· en· W2953090215 on OpenAlexafffund
A. J. Barclay, Ad van der Avoird, A. R. W. McKellar, N. Moazzen‐Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRotational–vibrational spectroscopyDimerAb initioIntermolecular forceWater dimerCarbon monoxidePotential energy surfaceAb initio quantum chemistry methodsInfrared spectroscopyChemistrySpectral lineInfraredAtomic physicsMolecular physicsComputational chemistryHydrogen bondMoleculePhysicsQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bound state rovibrational energy level calculations using a high-level intermolecular potential surface are reported for H2O-CO and D2O-CO. They predict the ground K = 1 levels to lie about 20 (12) cm-1 above K = 0 for H2O-CO (D2O-CO) in good agreement with past experiments. But the first excited K = 1 levels are predicted to lie about 3 cm-1 below their K = 0 counterparts in both cases. Line strength calculations also indicate that mid-infrared transitions from the K = 0 ground state to this seemingly anomalous excited K = 1 state should be observable. These predictions are strikingly verified by new spectroscopic measurements covering the C-O stretch region around 2200 cm-1 for H2O-CO, D2O-CO, and HOD-CO, and the O-D stretch region around 2700 cm-1 for D2O-CO, HOD-CO, and DOH-CO. The experiments probe a pulsed supersonic slit jet expansion using tunable infrared quantum cascade laser or optical parametric oscillator sources. Discrete perturbations in the O-D stretch region give an experimental lower limit to the binding energy D0 of about 340 cm-1 for D2O-CO, as compared to our calculated value of 368 cm-1. Wavefunction plots are presented to help understand the intermolecular dynamics of H2O-CO. Coriolis interactions are invoked to explain the seemingly anomalous energies of the first excited K = 1 levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207