MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953225811 · doi:10.14740/jocmr3849

Clinical Manifestation and Incidence of Cardiopulmonary Complications in Early Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Different Antibody Profiles

2019· article· en· W2953225811 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Suparaporn Wangkaew, Narawudt Prasertwittayakij, Juntima Euathrongchit

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCohortIncidence (geometry)RheumatologyGastroenterologyAutoantibodySurgeryAntibodyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There has been no prior inception cohort study comparing clinical manifestations and incidence rate (IR) of cardiopulmonary involvement among early systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients by difference in autoantibody profiles. We compared the differences in the clinical presentation at study entry and cumulative organ complications at last visit, as well as the IR of cardiopulmonary complications between anti-topoisomerase I antibody-positive SSc patients (pATA), ATA-negative (nATA), and the positive anti-centromere antibody patients (pACA). METHODS: An inception cohort of early diagnosis SSc patients (disease duration ≤ 3 years) seen at the Rheumatology Clinic, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, between January 2010 and June 2016, was studied. SSc patients who had follow-up duration as less than 1 year and those diagnosed with an overlap syndrome were excluded. All participants underwent electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) at the study entry and then annually. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients (90 diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), 69 women) with mean (standard deviation, SD) disease duration of 11.7 (8.8) months at cohort entry and an observational period of 3.8 (1.6) years, were recruited. There were 89 patients (78.1%) with pATA, 18 (15.8%) with nATA, and 7 (6.1%) with pACA. At enrollment, both pATA and nATA groups had a higher prevalence of dcSSc subtype, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) when compared with the pACA group. At the last visit, the pATA group had a higher cumulative prevalence of digital ulcers, joint contracture and tendon friction rub than the other groups. Both the pATA and nATA groups had a significantly higher IR of ILD compared to the pACA group (54.9 and 57.8 vs. 6.3 per 100 person-years). During the study period, no suspected myositis, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) ≥ 50 mm Hg or cardiac complications was observed in the pACA group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, the majority of which were dcSSc subtype with pATA, it was found that the presence of SSc-specific autoantibodies was associated with a distinctive clinical presentation and cumulative internal organ involvement, even in the early phase of the disease. Cardiopulmonary complications were rarely seen in the pACA group; whereas ILD complications were very common in both the pATA and nATA groups. A further study into the association of autoantibodies in nATA patients with ILD complications is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207