Lowest Singlet and Triplet Potential Energy Surfaces of S<sub>2</sub>N<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forty four stationary points have been located on the lowest singlet and triplet potential energy surfaces of S(2)N(2). Ten minima and ten saddle points on the lowest singlet surface and eleven minima and thirteen saddle points on the lowest triplet surface were found. All saddle points were connected to minima or lower-order saddle points by following the intrinsic reaction coordinate. Renner-Teller effects in the linear isomers were studied by examining their bending curves. The S(2)N(2) polymerization mechanism was investigated by first locating the transition state corresponding to ring opening and then considering all species connected to it that are close in energy. The commonly accepted mechanism is problematic due to the number of species that would lead to dissociation to SN + SN. Other possible isomers that are consistent with the experimental evidence but do not connect to SN radicals in the dissociation limit were examined. A mechanism of polymerization to (SN)(x)() is proposed that involves excitation of the square planar singlet molecule to the triplet surface. The triplet species then undergoes a puckering, and polymerization occurs in a direction approximately perpendicular to the S(2)N(2) plane. Consideration of the predicted vibrational frequencies suggests the structure of the second isomer of S(2)N(2). This isomer has a trans-NSSN structure with a long SS bond. The energetics of trans-NSSN are consistent with the observed temperature effects in the dimerization of SN. Analysis of the bending curves of linear NSSN and NSNS indicates that trans-NSSN is the only isomer which has a small yet significant barrier to that dimerization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".