MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P369 Should varicella vaccination be introduced into the national immunization guidelines?

2019· article· en· W2953311775 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emily Nguyen, Olivia Baird, Mohamad Dzulkarnain, Krista Wong, Nazifa Ali-Bujang, Siew-Ting Ooi, Riona Kivlehan, Ciaran Power, Eleanor J. Molloy, Judith Meehan

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationVaricella vaccineVaricella zoster virusImmunizationPopulationPediatricsIncidence (geometry)Chickenpox VaccineChickenpoxAttenuated vaccineImmunologyVirusVirologyEnvironmental healthAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) is a member of the herpesvirus family. The virus is transmitted via respiratory droplets and presents with fever and pruritic, erythematous vesicular skin lesions. Complications to VZV although uncommon, can be severe. The virus can remain dormant in sensory ganglia with potential to reactivate as Herpes Zoster. VZV can be prevented with a live attenuated vaccine derived from the Oka strain, given over two doses 4–8 weeks apart. Currently, the vaccine is given to high risk children (immunocompromised) in the Republic of Ireland or privately for the total cost of approximately €300. Objective To determine if the VZV vaccine should be introduced as part of the Irish National Immunisation Guidelines. Secondary aims include examining vaccine cost-effectiveness, safety, comparisons to other vaccination programs and association with Herpes Zoster. Methods A search was performed to identify articles on varicella vaccination published between 2008–2018 using the Pubmed database. Studies which focused on specific target groups such as immunocompromised individuals, the elderly, military population, irritable bowel disease, case studies, studies were excluded. Results Our total search identified 642 papers of which 91 were used. Implementation in Other Countries: Countries adopting universal varicella vaccine programs have shown a reduction in the incidence of varicella cases and required hospitalizations due to varicella zoster-associated complications (US, Canada, Germany, Australia). The United States implemented the program in 1996 and demonstrated a decrease of up to 89% of varicella-related cases. Safety and Side Effects:Administration of 2-dose vaccine resulted in better immunity, with no serious adverse effects. Cellulitis, anaphylaxis and breakthrough infections have been reported post-vaccine. Cost-Effectiveness and Herpes Zoster Boosting: Implementation of the vaccine would be cost-effective if considering the impact on varicella in isolation. There is no evidence to suggest a link between the VZV vaccine and an increase in Herpes Zoster. Conclusion Implementation of the varicella vaccine appears to be cost-effective if considering the impact on varicella in isolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207