SP271GFR MEASUREMENT SAMPLING STRATEGY: A CRITICAL ELEMENT IN GFR DETERMINATION AT ALL LEVELS OF GFR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Urinary inulin clearance is considered the gold standard of GFR measurement but plasma clearance protocols using more accessible and inexpensive iohexol and 99mTc-DTPA are far more commonly performed. Many different plasma sampling protocols exist (number of and timing of samples) but very little is known about the accuracy of these in general and in patients with specific characteristics. The aim of this study is to compare GFR determined by plasma clearance of iohexol and 99mTc-DTPA with varying sampling strategies against gold standard urinary inulin GFR and to identify sampling protocols with the greatest accuracy in eGFR subgroups and in patients with significant edema. METHODS: GFR was measured using urinary inulin clearance, plasma iohexol clearance, and plasma 99mTc DTPA clearance simultaneously in 77 subjects with known chronic kidney disease. Blood samples were collected at several timepoints to allow for evaluation of different sampling protocols. For each method, mean bias (alternate GFR - inulin GFR), precision (standard deviation of mean bias), and accuracy (the percent of alternate measures within 10% (P10) and 30% (P30) of inulin GFR were calculated for the entire cohort and for eGFR –EPI Cr subgroups (<30, 30-59 and ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m2) and edema subgroups (1&2, 3&4). RESULTS: Mean age 62.3 ± 12.6 yrs, BSA 2.0 ± 0.3 m2, 95% white race, 40% female sex. Mean inulin GFR 33 ± 19 ml/min/1.73m2. For eGFR less than 30 ml/min/1.73m2, the most accurate protocol included samples between 4-10 hours (P30= 76%). The 2-10 hour protocol was less accurate (P30=60%). For eGFR greater than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2, the most accurate protocol included samples between 2-4 hours (P10=70%). More prolonged sampling (2-10 hours) lead to reduced accuracy (P10=50%). For all iohexol protocols, inulin GFR was overestimated to a greater degree in those with significant edema (stages 3&4) as compared to those without significant edema (stages 1&2). For those with signficant edema, the most accurate protocol (P30=64) had delayed intial and final samples (4-10 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Delay of both initial and final samples in iohexol plasma clearance protocols significantly increases GFR measurement accuracy in those with low GFR and significant edema. Early samples yield the best accuracy in those with higher GFRs. These results reveal the need for individualized GFR measurement protocols based on patient characteristics including GFR and edema status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.041 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".