MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953466266 · doi:10.17615/tnbe-ay62

New loci associated with birth weight identify genetic links between intrauterine growth and adult height and metabolism

2020· article· en· W2953466266 on OpenAlexfundno aff
David M. Evans, Liang-Kee Goh, Anubha Mahajan, Zoltán Kutalik, Bjarke Feenstra, Elisabeth Thiering, Jing Hua Zhao, Pimphen Charoen, Marjan Kerkhof, Jouke‐Jan Hottenga, Hanieh Yaghootkar, Terho Lehtimäki, Momoko Horikoshi, Diane J. Berry, Eskil Kreiner‐Møller, Mariona Bustamante, Beaté St Pourcain, Dennis O. Mook‐Kanamori, Beverley M. Shields, Marika Kaakinen, Jonathan P. Bradfield, Diana L. Cousminer, Virpi Lindi, Ulla Sovio, Anthony J. Fulford, Nicole M. Warrington, Marcel den Hoed, Sheila J. Barton, H. Rob Taal, Thiemo Pfab, Branwen J. Hennig

Bibliographic record

VenueUNC Libraries · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteBiomedical Research CouncilStrategic Research CouncilEuropean Regional Development FundInstituto de Salud Carlos IIICenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthNorwegian Biodiversity Information CentreNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic ResearchUniversity of BristolH. Lundbeck A/SEgmont FondenNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesTurun Yliopistollinen KeskussairaalaChinese Society of Clinical OncologyNational Institute of Mental HealthDanmarks GrundforskningsfondSyddansk UniversitetAugustinus FondenEmil Aaltosen SäätiöPaavo Nurmen SäätiöCentre for Medical Systems BiologyNovo NordiskJuho Vainion SäätiöLundbeckfondenGeneralitat de CatalunyaGeneralitat ValencianaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekTurun YliopistosäätiöErasmus Medisch CentrumVrije Universiteit AmsterdamErasmus Universiteit RotterdamZonMwMünchner Zentrum für GesundheitswissenschaftenCurtin University of TechnologyNational Health and Medical Research CouncilOulun YliopistoSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science FoundationBoehringer Ingelheim FondsRaine Medical Research FoundationSundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie ForskningsrådMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionBiocenter, University of OuluNational Research FoundationNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDiabetes UKUniversity of SouthamptonWellcome TrustMedical Research CouncilFundació la Marató de TV3Yrjö Jahnssonin SäätiöJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation InternationalMarch of Dimes FoundationTampereen TuberkuloosisäätiöUniversität PotsdamGlaxoSmithKlineWomen and Infants Research FoundationBritish Heart FoundationScottish GovernmentChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia
KeywordsGeneticsBirth weightBiologyMetabolismPhysiologyDemographyEndocrinologyPregnancySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Birth weight within the normal range is associated with a variety of adult-onset diseases, but the mechanisms behind these associations are poorly understood1. Previous genome-wide association studies identified a variant in the ADCY5 gene associated both with birth weight and type 2 diabetes, and a second variant, near CCNL1, with no obvious link to adult traits2. In an expanded genome-wide association meta-analysis and follow-up study (up to 69,308 individuals of European descent from 43 studies), we have now extended the number of genome-wide significant loci to seven, accounting for a similar proportion of variance to maternal smoking. Five of the loci are known to be associated with other phenotypes: ADCY5 and CDKAL1 with type 2 diabetes; ADRB1 with adult blood pressure; and HMGA2 and LCORL with adult height. Our findings highlight genetic links between fetal growth and postnatal growth and metabolism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNC LibrariesSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207