MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2953561286 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-2623

Abstract 2623: Modulating native GABAA receptors in medulloblastoma with positive allosteric benzodiazepine-derivatives induces cell death

2019· article· en· W2953561286 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Kallay, Havva Keskin, Alexandra Ross, Manali Rupji, Olivia A. Moody, Xin Wang, Guanguan Li, Taukir Ahmed, Farjana Rashid, Michael Rajesh Stephen, Kirsten A. Cottrill, Austin Nuckois, Maxwell Xu, Deborah E. Martinson, Frank Tranghese, Yanxin Pei, James M. Cook, Jeanne Kowalski, Michael D. Taylor, Andrew Jenkins, Daniel Pomeranz Krummel, Soma Sengupta

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaAllosteric regulationGABAA receptorCancer researchBiologyReceptorBenzodiazepinePharmacologyChemistryInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pediatric brain cancer medulloblastoma standard-of-care results in numerous comorbidities. Medulloblastoma is comprised of four molecular subgroups. Group 3 subgroup patients have the highest relapse rates and 20% survival after standard-of-care. Group 3 tumors have high expression of GABRA5, which codes for the α5 subunit of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR). We are advancing a therapeutic approach for group 3 based on GABAAR modulation using benzodiazepine-derivatives. We performed analysis of GABR and MYC expression in medulloblastoma tumors and used molecular, cell biological, and whole-cell electrophysiology approaches to establish presence of a functional ‘druggable’ GABAAR in group 3 cells. Analysis of expression of 763 medulloblastoma tumors reveals that group 3 tumors share high subgroup-specific and correlative expression of GABR genes, which code for GABAAR subunits α5, β3 and γ2 and 3. There are ~1000 functional α5-GABAARs per group 3 patient-derived cell that mediate a basal chloride-anion efflux of 2x109 ions/sec. Benzodiazepines, designed to prefer α5-GABAAR, impair group 3 cell viability by enhancing chloride-anion efflux with subtle changes in their structure having significant impact on potency. A potent, non-toxic benzodiazepine (‘KRM-II-08’) binds to the α5-GABAAR (0.8 μM EC50) enhancing a chloride-anion efflux that induces mitochondrial membrane depolarization and in response, TP53 upregulation and p53, constitutively phosphorylated at S392, cytoplasmic localization. This correlates with pro-apoptotic Bcl-2-associated death promoter (BAD) protein localization. GABR expression can serve as a diagnostic biomarker for group 3 tumors, while α5-GABAAR is a therapeutic target for benzodiazepine binding, enhancing an ion imbalance that induces apoptosis. Citation Format: Laura Kallay, Havva Keskin, Alexandra Ross, Manali Rupji, Olivia A. Moody, Xin Wang, Guanguan Li, Taukir Ahmed, Farjana Rashid, Michael Rajesh Stephen, Kirsten A. Cottrill, Austin Nuckois, Maxwell Xu, Deborah E. Martinson, Frank Tranghese, Yanxin Pei, James M. Cook, Jeanne Kowalski, Michael D. Taylor, Andrew Jenkins, Daniel Pomeranz Krummel, Soma Sengupta. Modulating native GABAA receptors in medulloblastoma with positive allosteric benzodiazepine-derivatives induces cell death [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2623.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→