MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Regional Activation of Supraspinatus, Infraspinatus and Periscapular Musculature during Strengthening Exercises with Elastic Bands

2019· article· en· W2953566281 on OpenAlexaff
Talia Alenabi, Ranjit Joseph, Tea Lulic, Clark R. Dickerson

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotator cuffIsometric exerciseMedicineElectromyographyCadencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationKinematicsFunctional electrical stimulationSupraspinatus muscleOrthodonticsPhysical therapyAnatomyStimulationInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Strengthening of the rotator cuff and periscapular muscles is crucial for appropriate neuromuscular control of the mobile glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joints. The aim of the current study was to quantify and compare the regional activation of supraspinatus (SUP), infraspinatus (INF) and some periscapular muscles during shoulder strengthening exercises with elastic bands. METHODS:27 right handed healthy volunteers (22.5 ± 2.7 years old) were recruited. Four fine wire electrodes were inserted into the anterior and posterior regions of SUP and the superior and middle regions of INF under ultrasound guidance. Four paired surface electrodes collected data from the upper, middle and lower trapezius and serratus anterior (UT, MT, LL, SERR respectively). Participants performed four resistance exercises (in Y, T, W and L postures) with elastic bands while maintaining good form and cadence. Kinematics were recorded synchronously by Vicon motion tracking system. Electromyography values were presented as % of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and compared across exercises using ANOVA. RESULTS: Rotator cuff and periscapular muscles showed similar activation profiles throughout the Y, W and T exercises. The peak activation of SUP anterior occurred in 20% of L exercise cycle while for other regions it occurred in 40-60% of time cycle. Mean activations of all rotator cuff partitions were over 40% MVIC during four exercises, except middle INF during T exercise (29.3% MVIC). LT was activated >80% MVIC during all four exercises, with no significant differences across exercises while MT was significantly more active in T exercise. The activations of SERR and UT were significantly higher during Y exercise. CONCLUSIONS: YTWL exercises induced moderate to high activation in supraspinatus and infraspinatus partitions, and very high activation in lower trapezius. These exercises are appropriate for strengthening of some rotator cuff and periscapular muscles and can potentially be useful for rehabilitation of scapular dyskinesia and shoulder impingement. However, caution should be taken while prescribing Y exercise for these pathologic conditions as this exercise may induce high activation in UT. Providing additional strengthening exercises for SERR to this exercise package is recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicShoulder Injury and Treatment→French-language works237,207→