MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953677656 · doi:10.2147/vmrr.s202331

<p>First identification of <em>mcr-1/mcr-2</em> genes in the fecal microbiota of Canadian commercial pigs during the growing and finishing period</p>

2019· article· en· W2953677656 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mohamed Rhouma, William Thériault, Nassima Rabhi, Caroline Duchaine, Sylvain Quessy, Philippe Fravalo

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Medicine Research and Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFecesBiologyGenePeriod (music)Identification (biology)MicrobiologyGeneticsBotanyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First identification of mcr-1/mcr-2 genes in the fecal microbiota of Canadian commercial pigs during the growing and finishing period Mohamed Rhouma,1 William Thériault,1 Nassima Rabhi,1 Caroline Duchaine,2 Sylvain Quessy,1 Philippe Fravalo11Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 2M2, Canada; 2Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 4G5, Canada Colistin is considered one of the last-resort antibiotics used for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) in humans.1 This antibiotic is classified by the World Health Organization, among the category of the Highest Priority Critically Important Antimicrobials for human medicine.2 In this regard, the global dissemination of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance, conferred by themobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes, has raised serious concern among physicians and scientists worldwide.2 On the other hand, colistin has been widely used in food animals in many countries either for disease therapy, prophylaxis or for growth promotion.3 Many studies reported a high prevalence of mcr genes on bacterial isolates from animals' origin compared to humans, and consequently animals, particularly pig production, were pointed out as the greatest cause of bacterial colistin resistance spread.1 In pigs, mcr genes were isolated mainly from colistin resistant E. coli, Salmonella and Klebsiella isolates, with mcr-1 gene being themost frequently identified gene among the eight types of mcr genes currently described.1 Among other Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) of pig origin, mcr genes were identified in Moraxella spp.,4 and in Aeromonas hydrophila,5 enforcing the interest to consider the mcr presence at the microbiota level. In Canada, although colistin is not approved for use in veterinarymedicine, it was sometimes used in pigs according to special precautions for the oral treatment of digestive infections caused by GNB.1 Nevertheless, mcr-1 gene has been identified in E. coli isolated from humans, as well as from lean ground beef in Canada.6 However, to the best of our knowledge, mcr genes have never been identified in animals at the farm level in Canada. Here we reportthe screening of fecal samples obtained from one Canadian commercial pig farm, to determine the prevalence over the growing period of mcr-1 and mcr-2 genes in the fecal microbiota of pigs. Colistin has never been used in this farm. However, tiamulin and chlortetracycline were used in the post-weaning period and salinomycin as well as narasin were used during the growing phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Medicine Research and ReportsSame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207