Modulation of the optical properties of zigzag silicene nanoribbons by double carbon chains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using first-principles calculations, we investigate the electronic and optical properties of zigzag silicene nanoribbons substituted with double carbon chains. The results show that the chains are pulled nearly straight and produce a rather obvious transverse contraction in the width direction of the ribbon. The double carbon chains introduce defect states that appear as two degenerate bands across the Fermi level. These nanoribbons are always metallic regardless of the position of the carbon chains or the ribbon width. Under the same bandwidth, the imaginary parts of the dielectric functions in the Ex and Ey directions reveal red- and blue-shifts, respectively, with increasing distance between the two C chains. The imaginary parts of the dielectric functions in the Ex and Ey directions reveal blue- and redshifts, respectively, with increasing ribbon width. Three major peaks in the imaginary part of the dielectric function correspond to the intrinsic plasma frequencies originating from electron transitions of silicon and carbon. Such excellent electronic and optical properties may lead to some important applications of the nanoribbons in short-wavelength optoelectronic devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".