MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953786622 · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10741-9

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 antagonizes DNA resection at double-strand breaks

2019· article· en· W2953786622 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie‐Christine Caron, Ajit Kumar Sharma, Julia O’Sullivan, Logan R. Myler, Maria Tedim Ferreira, Amélie Rodrigue, Yan Coulombe, Chantal Éthier, Jean‐Philippe Gagné, Marie-France Langelier, John M. Pascal, Ilya J. Finkelstein, Michael J. Hendzel, Guy G. Poirier, Jean‐Yves Masson

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsGenome CanadaUniversité de MontréalCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversity of AlbertaUniversité Laval
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCIHR Skin Research Training CentreFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthGovernment of CanadaUniversity of PennsylvaniaCancer Prevention and Research Institute of TexasWelch Foundation
KeywordsPoly ADP ribose polymeraseDNAPolymeraseDNA repairHomologous recombinationDNA damageChromatinPARP inhibitorMolecular biologyReplication protein ABiologyChemistryCell biologyGeneticsDNA-binding proteinGeneTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PARP-1 is rapidly recruited and activated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Upon activation, PARP-1 synthesizes a structurally complex polymer composed of ADP-ribose units that facilitates local chromatin relaxation and the recruitment of DNA repair factors. Here, we identify a function for PARP-1 in DNA DSB resection. Remarkably, inhibition of PARP-1 leads to hyperresected DNA DSBs. We show that loss of PARP-1 and hyperresection are associated with loss of Ku, 53BP1 and RIF1 resection inhibitors from the break site. DNA curtains analysis show that EXO1-mediated resection is blocked by PARP-1. Furthermore, PARP-1 abrogation leads to increased DNA resection tracks and an increase of homologous recombination in cellulo. Our results, therefore, place PARP-1 activation as a critical early event for DNA DSB repair activation and regulation of resection. Hence, our work has direct implications for the clinical use and effectiveness of PARP inhibition, which is prescribed for the treatment of various malignancies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations183
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207