MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Finite-Temperature Topological Invariant for Interacting Systems

2020· article· en· W2953787357 on OpenAlexaff
R. G. Unanyan, Maximilian Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, Michael Fleischhauer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsInvariant (physics)Ground stateWinding numberTopological quantum numberDegenerate energy levelsTopology (electrical circuits)Topological orderSuperlatticeZero temperatureQuantum mechanicsMathematical physicsQuantumMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We generalize the ensemble geometric phase, recently introduced to classify the topology of density matrices, to finite-temperature states of interacting systems in one spatial dimension (1D). This includes cases where the gapped ground state has a fractional filling and is degenerate. At zero temperature the corresponding topological invariant agrees with the well-known invariant of Niu, Thouless, and Wu. We show that its value at finite temperatures is identical to that of the ground state below some critical temperature T_{c} larger than the many-body gap. We illustrate our result with numerical simulations of the 1D extended superlattice Bose-Hubbard model at quarter filling. Here, a cyclic change of parameters in the ground state leads to a topological charge pump with fractional winding ν=1/2. The particle transport is no longer quantized when the temperature becomes comparable to the many-body gap, yet the winding of the generalized ensemble geometric phase is.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207