The Effectiveness of a Cognitive-Behavioral Counseling Program in Modifying the Negative Behavior Among Students of Aqabat Jaber School Camp in the Governorate of Jericho
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a counseling program in modifying the negativebehavior of male students aged 11-15 years. The researcher used the semi-empirical approach with twomeasurements, pre and posttest measurements. A purposive sample of 52 students was selected and divided into twogroups, experimental and control groups. Each group comprised a number of 26 male students respectively. Theresearcher developed the behavioral modification and counseling program questionnaire.The study showed that there were statistically significant differences in reducing the level of negative behavior in theexperimental group attributed to the counseling program. The experimental group mean reached a score of 87.08 andthe control group’s mean was 227. The results also indicated that the experimental group has a statisticallysignificant difference for the minimum permissible level of negative behavior (110), where the mean for negativebehavior reached 87.08, a decrease of 22.92. The effect of the independent factor on the dependent factor wassignificant, given that the d-value was 2.07, which is greater than the value 0.8. The study recommended for thegroup counseling program to be employed and circulated due to its positive results in modifying behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it