Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Syphilitic gumma involving the penis is a rare manifestation of tertiary syphilis. Only seventeen cases have been reported in the literature. It can mimic other diagnoses such as penile carcinoma. We report a case of a 56 year old male that had been sexually abstinent for over 10 years and presenting with a 4 cm painful penile lesion with clinically palpable bilateral inguinal nodes with no prior history of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). A positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan identified the penile mass as being hypermetabolic and suspicious for penile carcinoma. Several inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes were also found to be suspicious for penile carcinoma. A penile biopsy was proposed and declined by the patient as he opted for a partial penectomy. The surgery was performed for diagnostic and palliative purposes. Histopathological studies revealed the presence of polymorphous, granulomatous, epitheloid inflammatory infiltrate with giant cells. Additional microbiologic testing confirmed the diagnosis of tertiary syphilis, presenting as gummatous syphillis associated with neurosyphilis. The patient was treated with intravenous penicillin and had adequate clinical clinical and serologic 12 months following treatment. Gummatous syphillis is a rare entity, but should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a penile lesion. To rule out this possibility, a biopsy should always be performed prior to invasive penis surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it