MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953903869 · doi:10.1113/jp278088

Postnatal triglyceride accumulation is regulated by mineralocorticoid receptor activation under basal and stress conditions

2019· article· en· W2953903869 on OpenAlexafffund
Erin Faught, Mathilakath M. Vijayan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsEndocrinologyMineralocorticoid receptorInternal medicineGlucocorticoid receptorAdipose triglyceride lipaseBiologyReceptorMineralocorticoidLipid metabolismLipogenesisAdipogenesisLipolysisGlucocorticoidAdipose tissueAldosteroneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS: Glucocorticoids (GCs) either enhance or reduce obesity in mammals, but limited information exists on the role of corticosteroid receptors in mediating the effect of GCs on lipid metabolism during postnatal development. Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation leads to triglyceride (TG) accumulation post-feeding, whereas glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activation reduces TG levels. The TG profile was inversely related to the lipoprotein lipase (lpl) transcript abundance, and this gene was downregulated by MR activation. Cortisol plays an important role in adipogenesis during postnatal development in zebrafish, and this includes gene/pathway-specific signalling by GR, MR and GR/MR interactions. Ubiquitous MR and GR knockout in zebrafish provides an excellent model to study the mode of action of GCs in regulating lipid metabolism. ABSTRACT: Glucocorticoids (GCs) act through two receptors, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which differ in both their affinity to bind GCs and their function. As MR has 10-fold higher affinity for GCs compared to GR, it has been postulated that MR activation occurs at basal levels, while stress levels of these steroid hormones activate GR signalling. There is a growing body of evidence that both these receptors are involved in GC-mediated lipid metabolism. However, the role of GCs in lipogenesis and lipolysis is controversial, as these steroids appear to both enhance and reduce obesity. As lipid synthesis is a critical part of early development, we hypothesized that both MR and GR contribute to lipid regulation by GCs during postnatal growth. Using MR and GR knockout zebrafish, we demonstrate that MR activation, but not GR activation, is involved in triglyceride (TG) accumulation during the larval development post feeding. Lack of MRs did not affect the gene expression of fatty acid synthase (fas), or acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2 (dgat2), but increased lipoprotein lipase (lpl) transcript abundance. Activation of GR with exogenous cortisol decreased TG levels and increased lpl mRNA levels, but these responses require the presence of MR. Larval transcriptome revealed that MR was the primary regulator of genes involved in lipid synthesis, while GR activation favoured lipid catabolism. Our results underscore a key role for MR activation in mediating postnatal lipid accumulation, as well as cooperatively regulating GR-mediated lipolysis during postnatal stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207