MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953981797

Medical Scope:HIF活性化薬の貧血・腎臓病・代謝異常への効果〜ポストEPO製剤の開発〜

2019· article· ja· W2953981797 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
山崎 智貴, ほか

Bibliographic record

VenuePharma Medica · 2019
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)BusinessComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

低酸素誘導因子(hypoxia-inducible factor;HIF)は,細胞の低酸素応答を担う主要な転写因子である。HIFの活性化は内因性のエリスロポエチン(erythropoietin;EPO)産生や,体内での鉄利用を最適化することでヘモグロビン(Hb)値を上昇させる。そのためHIF活性化薬は腎性貧血の新規治療薬として,現在臨床第Ⅱ相・第Ⅲ相試験まで進んでおり,赤血球造血刺激因子製剤(erythropoiesis stimulating agent;ESA)使用による副作用や高コストを回避し,ESA低反応性貧血を改善させることが期待されている。さらにHIF活性化薬は,さまざまな動物実験で,急性腎障害(acute kidney injury;AKI)を軽減させることや,肥満や糖・脂質異常症にも有益である可能性が報告されている。今後,網膜症や悪性腫瘍の進展を中心とした副作用に対する安全性や,長期使用の有効性についての検討が必要である。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharma MedicaSame topicErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFrench-language works237,207