MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954043900 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2019.05.619

SUN-215 PATIENT ENGAGEMENT IN KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: A COLLABORATIVE MODEL FOR MOVING KIDNEY HEALTH RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE

2019· article· en· W2954043900 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mary Beaucage, Selina Allu, Meghan J. Elliott, Adeera Levin

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnowledge translationMedicinePresentation (obstetrics)Clinical PracticeTranslation (biology)Process (computing)Key (lock)Medical educationCase presentationKnowledge managementNursingComputer scienceSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective knowledge translation is the process of moving research evidence into clinical practice. Can-SOLVE CKD is a pan-Canadian patient-oriented kidney research network with an established Knowledge User (KU) and Translation (KT) Committee that includes two patient partners as integral members. This committee provides guidance, expertise, and direction for all KT activities undertaken by research projects within the network and ensures KT approaches are patient centered. In this presentation, we will define key concepts related to KT, outline the role of the KU/KT Committee in supporting kidney health research, and highlight the contributions of patient partners on this committee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.152
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.147
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1520.147
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.013
Scholarly communication0.0200.012
Open science0.0040.037
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.544
GPT teacher head0.621
Teacher spread0.076 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207