MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effect Of An Antioxidant Cocktail On Flow-Mediated Dilation In Endurance Athletes

2019· article· en· W2954094664 on OpenAlexaff
Trevor J. King, Heather L. Petrick, Philip J. Millar, Jamie F. Burr

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboReactive hyperemiaInternal medicineEndotheliumVitamin CEndocrinologyAntioxidantEndothelial dysfunctionVasodilationCardiologyChemistryPathologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a measure of endothelial function, and an FMD response can be initiated by different blood flow induced shear stimuli (e.g. sustained vs. transient exposure), each testing a different aspect of endothelial function. Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) are known to impair FMD, but low levels of ROS may be involved in endothelial cell signaling. Endurance exercise bombards the endothelium with ROS and may induce an adaptive response in the endothelium of trained individuals. However, it is unknown whether ROS are involved in the FMD response among endurance trained athletes. PURPOSE: To identify the involvement of ROS in the FMD response of trained endurance athletes to a variety of shear stimuli. METHODS: 10 trained runners and cyclists (n =3 women) performed an incremental exercise test and two experimental FMD visits. An antioxidant cocktail (AOC) or inactive placebo was given prior to each experimental visit (1 g vitamin C, 600 IU vitamin E, 600 mg alpha lipoic acid). Each identical experimental visit involved 3 FMD tests. FMD was measured as reactive hyperemia (RH)-FMD (transient stimulus), sustained stimulus (SS)-FMD (6-min of 9 kg rhythmic handgrip squeezing), and progressive (p)-FMD (rhythmic handgrip squeezing at 3, 6, and 9 kg). RESULTS: Mean VO2max was 58 ± 5 ml∙kg-1∙min-1. Within each FMD method (RH-, SS-, and p-FMD) shear rate was not different between AOC and Placebo (all p > 0.4). SS-FMD was not altered by AOC (PLA = 2.3 ± 1.0 mm, AOC = 2.6 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.44), and the FMD/shear rate slope created using p-FMD was not altered by AOC (PLA = 0.018 ± 0.002 mm∙s, AOC = 0.017 ± 0.001 mm∙s, p = 0.78). There was a trend for a reduction in RH-FMD following AOC consumption (PLA = 3.1 ± 0.8 mm, AOC = 2.5 ± 1.4 mm, p = 0.08), and the RH-FMD response to AOC was significantly different from the SS-FMD response to AOC (p = 0.04). Following covariance for baseline diameter, SS-FMD (p = 0.003) and RH-FMD (p = 0.04) were significantly reduced following AOC consumption, and there was a trend for a difference in response to AOC between methods (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that ROS may be involved in the FMD response of trained endurance athletes, and the degree of involvement may vary based on shear stress stimulus. NSERC, CFI, ERA-OMRIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→