MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954210077 · doi:10.1126/science.aax0076

Direct mapping of curve-crossing dynamics in IBr by attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy

2019· article· en· W2954210077 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuki Kobayashi, Kristina F. Chang, Tao Zeng, Daniel M. Neumark, Stephen R. Leone

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersArmy Research OfficeDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCarleton UniversityNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAttosecondUltrafast laser spectroscopyDiabaticAtomic physicsSpectroscopyAbsorption spectroscopyPhysicsFemtosecondAdiabatic processElectronPhotodissociationDissociation (chemistry)Avoided crossingExtreme ultravioletPhotoexcitationUltrashort pulseMolecular physicsLaserChemistryOpticsPhotochemistryExcited stateQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A panoramic view of photodissociation As light pulses get shorter in time, they correspondingly get broader in frequency. Kobayashi et al. take advantage of both properties of attosecond pulses to elucidate iodine monobromide (IBr) photodissociation by detecting ultrafast bromine and iodine spectral shifts simultaneously. A preliminary burst of light weakens the I–Br bond. Then, as the atoms fly apart, they reach a configuration where the bond vibration can couple ground and excited electronic states. The broadband probe pulse reveals rapid changes in each atom's electronic structure at this juncture. Science , this issue p. 79

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations137
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207