MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954251468 · doi:10.1522/rhe.v3i1.855

Les élèves issus de l'immigration sont-ils des élèves à besoins éducatifs particuliers?

2019· article· fr· W2954251468 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Stéphanie Bauer, Corina Borri-Anadòn, Moira Laffranchini Ngoenha

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue hybride de l éducation · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La recherche en inclusion scolaire s’est intéressée principalement aux élèves porteurs de handicap et peu aux élèves issus de la migration. Notre contribution porte sur les promesses et défis de la reconnaissance des rapports ethniques au sein de l’inclusion scolaire. Nous mobilisons à cet effet la notion d’élèves à besoins éducatifs particuliers en examinant de manière critique les enjeux conceptuels et pratiques qu’elle soulève, notamment lorsqu’elle est utilisée pour désigner les élèves issus de l’immigration. Seront également dégagées des pistes de réflexion pour conduire l’école à une mobilisation des ressources éducatives particulières amenées par ces mêmes élèves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue hybride de l éducationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207