Pisa syndrome in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a complex syndrome of ventriculomegaly that can include parkinsonian-like features besides the classical triad of cognitive decline, urinary incontinence, and gait/balance disturbances. Pisa syndrome (PS) is a postural abnormality often associated with parkinsonism and defined as lateral trunk flexion greater than 10° while standing that resolves in the supine position. We reported a case series of classical "fixed" PS and one case of "Metronome" recurrent side-alternating PS in iNPH, displaying opposite electromyographic patterns of paraspinal muscles. METHODS: Eighty-five iNPH patients were followed longitudinally for at least one year through scheduled clinical and neuropsychological visits. RESULTS: Five (5.9%) subjects revealed PS. None of them had nigrostriatal dopaminergic involvement detected by [123I]FP-CIT SPECT. Among these patients, four had "fixed" PS, whereas one showed a recurrent side-alternating PS which repeatedly improved after ventriculo-peritoneal shunt and following adjustments of the valve-opening pressure of the shunt system. DISCUSSION: This is the first case series of PS in iNPH and the first report of "Metronome" PS in iNPH. The prompt response of the abnormal trunk postures through cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery suggests a causative role of an altered CSF dynamics. PS and gait disorders in iNPH could be explained by a direct involvement of cortico-subcortical pathways and subsequent secondary brainstem involvement, with also a possible direct functional damage of the basal ganglia at the postsynaptic level, due to enlargement of the ventricular system and impaired CSF dynamics. The early detection of these cases supports a proper surgical management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".