MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954274410 · doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00515

Aqueous Dispersions of Esterified Lignin Particles for Hydrophobic Coatings

2019· article· en· W2954274410 on OpenAlexafffund
Qi Hua, Liyang Liu, Muzaffer A. Karaaslan, Scott Renneckar

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Chemistry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanada Research ChairsAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsLigninContact angleOrganic chemistryAqueous solutionBiopolymerChemistryChemical engineeringWaxWettingMaterials sciencePolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An aqueous biopolymer dispersion for a coating material was synthesized utilizing softwood kraft lignin and a natural organic acid. The chemical treatment of lignin was a two-step process, which consisted of hydroxyethylation of the phenolics utilizing ethylene carbonate and alkaline catalyst, creating uniform aliphatic hydroxyl functionality. This procedure was followed by direct esterification of the hydroxyls with oleic acid. 13C NMR analysis of the lignin indicated 88-89% substitution of the lignin hydroxyl groups forming an ethyl oleate lignin derivative. Solutions of lignin derivatives were slowly precipitated through dialysis resulting in the modified lignin forming a stable dispersion of microparticles in distilled water. Dynamic light scattering revealed the wax-like particles had a 1-2 m average diameter. Lignin-based particles were sprayed onto a variety of surfaces to measure the ability to change the surface wettability. The lignin-based particles enhanced the hydrophobicity of all the substrates tested, increasing the contact angle for pulp sheets and solid wood. Because of the benign reagents involved in the coating synthesis, the avoidance of volatile organic solvents in the application, this process provided a low environmental solution for synthesis of hydrophobic coatings utilizing natural compounds that are known to repel water in nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ChemistrySame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207