MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954286352 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.9b03899

DFT and MD Studies of Formaldehyde-Derived DNA Adducts: Molecular-Level Insights into the Differential Mispairing Potentials of the Adenine, Cytosine, and Guanine Lesions

2019· article· en· W2954286352 on OpenAlexafffund
Katie A. Wilson, Josh L. Garden, Natasha T. Wetmore, Lindey R. Felske, Stacey D. Wetmore

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsGuanineCytosineFormaldehydeDNAAdductChemistryDifferential (mechanical device)Computational chemistryPhotochemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryNucleotidePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone is a potent nicotine-based carcinogen that generates many DNA lesions, including the HOCH 2 –C, HOCH 2 –G, and HOCH 2 -A hydroxymethyl adducts. Despite all lesions containing an altered exocyclic amino group, which allows the hydroxymethyl group to be directed away from the Watson–Crick binding face, only the most persistent adenine adduct is mutagenic. As a first step toward understanding this differential mutagenicity, density functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to gain atomic-level structural details of these DNA damage products. DFT calculations reveal that all three lesions exhibit conformational diversity. However, regardless of the hydroxymethyl–nucleobase orientation, both DFT and MD simulations highlight that HOCH 2 –C and HOCH 2 –G form pairs with the canonical complementary base (G and C, respectively) that are structural and energetically preferred over mispairs. In contrast, depending on the hydroxymethyl–nucleobase orientation, the Watson–Crick HOCH 2 -A:T pair can become significantly destabilized relative to undamaged A:T. As a result, HOCH 2 -A mispairs with G, C, and A are energetically accessible and maintain key geometrical features of canonical DNA. Overall, our data directly correlate with the reported differential mutagenicity of the hydroxylmethyl lesions and will encourage future studies to further uncover the cellular impact of the most persistent adenine lesion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207