MIRROS: An ongoing randomized phase 3 trial of idasanutlin + ARA-C in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS7063 Background: The prognosis for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor, with 3-year overall survival rates ~10–30% after intensive chemotherapy-based approaches. Despite the advent of targeted therapies, considerable unmet medical need remains in this population. Idasanutlin (RG7388; RO5503781) is an orally available small molecule that binds to the murine double minute 2 (MDM2) protein and blocks MDM2 interaction with p53. This stabilizes and activates p53 and facilitates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, preventing tumor growth. A phase 1b study of idasanutlin + ARA-C in pts with R/R AML, irrespective of TP53 mutation status (NCT01773408), has shown a composite complete remission (CR) rate (CR plus CR with incomplete platelet or hematologic recovery) of 29% (Martinelli et al. 2016). Methods: MIRROS (NCT02545283; WO29519) is an international, phase 3, double-blind, randomized study comparing idasanutlin (300 mg bid) + ARA-C (1 g/m2 qd) days 1–5 versus placebo + ARA-C in 440 pts with first or second R/R AML, with or without TP53 mutation. The primary endpoint is overall survival in pts with wild-type (WT) TP53. Secondary endpoints include CR, overall remission rates, event-free survival (EFS) and percentages of pts undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. MIRROS integrates phase 2 trial methodology into the phase 3 design by incorporating an interim analysis (IA) in 120 pts with WT TP53, using a high bar on the odds ratio for durable CR and EFS to assess for futility. Stop/go gating criteria for safety were also implemented. The IA was performed by an independent data monitoring committee and study continuation criteria were successfully met in mid-2017. This innovative strategy has allowed acceleration of the idasanutlin development program while maintaining a robust trial design. As of December 31 2018, 351 pts had been enrolled. The MIRROS study is ongoing and its results will inform the potential role of idasanutlin and MDM2 inhibition in the treatment of R/R AML. Clinical trial information: NCT02545283; WO29519.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".