MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954414629 · doi:10.29173/jjs19s

Guest Editor's Introduction to Volume 11

2016· article· en· W2954414629 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Peter T. Dunlap

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Jungian Scholarly Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicJungian Analytical Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleasureInterpretation (philosophy)MythologyNuminousArtArt historyPsychoanalysisSociologyLiteraturePsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Last year we successfully introduced the Kindle and other portable devices to the Journal of Jungian Scholarly Studies. This year's Journal continues those formatting choices. As guest editor of this year’s journal I have the pleasure of introducing the four essays included in this volume.
 This year we have many good contributions building off of the 2015 JSSS conference on Nature and the Feminine: Psychological and Cultural Reflections that was held in Edmonton, Canada.
 The first paper in this year's Journal is by Elizabeth Nelson in which she connects a Jungian interpretation of the Homeric Hymn to Demeter with “a ritualized enactment of the central Eleusinian mysteries using the principles of authentic movement.” Through this practice she is able to approach Homer’s writing with a fresh perspective that interprets the reciprocal relationship between Hades and Persephone as generative, leading to the abundance of the underworld. What is particularly important about Elizabeth's paper is her effort to discuss movement as a means of interpreting myth. While necessarily approached experimentally, the use of movement in this manner offers room for future innovation.
 The second paper in this year’s journal is by Matthew Fike who explores Jungian themes in Doris Lessing’s novel Briefing for a Descent into Hell. He begins by describing what is known about Lessing’s modest appreciation of Jung and then suggests that she drew more on Jungian elements than has been previously recognized. Fike focuses on the extent to which Lessing likely was well versed in Jung’s Memories, Dreams, Reflections, which she used to portray her character “Charles Watkins’s descent into madness and return to sanity.” In his analysis Fike compares Jung’s actual experience of encountering the unconscious to Lessing’s description of Watkins’s. And, as you will see, the comparison is detailed and convincing.
 The third paper in the journal is by Inez Martinez who explores the way in which Isak Dinesen, in her short story “Blue Stones,” is able to reanimate the material world. Martinez connects these efforts to Jung’s interest in literature as a compensatory force for what a culture denies. She also traces the unintended consequences of Jung’s use of “deformed rather than perceived images,” in how they diminish “the material aspects of synchronicities.” Martinez encourages us to reconsider these aspects as a way of helping to heal an illness of our time, that is, the way in which our loss of the liveliness of matter has led to our being possessed by materialism. By connecting us to Dinesen’s writing, Martinez offers an example of literature as healing, as activating a reanimating power of the objective psyche.
 I’m pleased to introduce the fourth paper that has been written by Halide Aral from the University of Çankaya in Turkey. She analyzes “how heroic masculinity and Christianity, due to their negative attitude toward the feminine, problematize masculine individuation.” Using Jungian thought to guide the development of this thesis, Aral examines the characters of Romeo and Mercutio in Shakespear’s Romeo and Juliet. In this paper Aral makes a good case for the difficulties of masculine individuation, the necessity for it to include an integration of the feminine, and the lost opportunities when the femine is not integrated.
 Peter T. DunlapGuest Editor

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Jungian Scholarly StudiesSame topicJungian Analytical PsychologyFrench-language works237,207