Discriminatory Customary Practices Against Women’s Rights: An Account Of Intervention Strategies By Southern African Developing States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discriminatory customary practices against the protection of gender rights still thrive in many Southern African developing states despite domestic and international legal regimes to prevent them. These practices were borne out of customary inclinations of the patriarchal social system in most African communities, which hold women and the girl-child in perpetual subordination to the male. In other words, the African customary systems wrongly perceive the male gender as being naturally superior to the female. More so, the loopholes in the executive and legislative efforts to combat human rights abuses as well as judicial pronouncements and governmental apathy in eradicating abuses against gender discrimination towards women in the Southern African developing states are apparent. Consequently, discriminatory customary practices continue to thrive despite legislative framework protecting gender rights in the states. The methodology adopted in this paper is a doctrinal approach, which places reliance on legal materials that are enacted and enforced by African Developing states. The article examines international and states laws, norms, institutions, international and national publications and other international legal instruments relating to gender discrimination. Most importantly, the central attention of this study focuses on the discriminatory customary practices against women in the Southern African Developing States. The current study finds that, despite identifiable discriminatory customary practices which are still practised and condoned as being the lifestyle and tradition of groups are criminalized and declared abhorrent by specific domestic legislation of nations, the human rights of the girl-child and women continue to be in chains and fetters. In conclusion, this article advocates increased advocacy, judicial activism and more proactive legislative action that protect women and the girl-child in the Southern African developing states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".