MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954455053 · doi:10.1002/jsid.824

Curved OLED microdisplays

2019· article· en· W2954455053 on OpenAlex
Tony Maindron, Bertrand Chambion, Marion Provost, A. Vandeneynde, Patrick Peray, Marc Zussy, J. Dechamp, C. Rossat, Stéphanie Gonnin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Society for Information Display · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean CommissionInstitut national de la recherche scientifique
KeywordsWaferOLEDMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsComputer scienceSiliconAMOLEDCurvatureCMOSRadius of curvatureDiagonalLayer (electronics)NanotechnologyActive matrix

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Technical background for CMOS substrate thinning of CEA‐LETI (historically developed for through silicon via technology as well as for more recent activity to provide curved image sensors, for IR as well as for visible spectra) has been applied to realize curved OLED‐based microdisplays. It will be shown that test OLEDs made onto silicon wafers as well as 873 × 500 WVGA, 0.38″ diagonal, and an innovative 1920 × 1200 WUXGA, 1″diagonal, CMOS‐based microdisplays can be curved at R = 45 mm radius of curvature (1D) with no negative impact onto the circuit electrical characteristics. This feature can allow significant innovation on the system and application because it can help to redesign simpler and lighter optical engine systems, in the same manner as for curved image sensors. These results can be obtained owing to the integration of a new protective hard coat layer that has been used in conjunction with a robust thin‐film encapsulation to protect OLEDs from mechanical ingress (from process steps and handling) and oxidizing gas of the atmosphere, respectively. Results have been produced within the framework of the EU‐funded, H2020 project, called L arge cost‐effective O LED MI cro D isplays (LOMID and their applications).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it