A Model of Forgiveness: Development and Implementation at the Belleville Seventh-day Adventist Church, Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problem In the Belleville Seventh-day Adventist Church, many attendees have incorrect views about forgiveness that have created many personal and relational problems inside and outside the church. Thus, the church needs a biblical and practical model of forgiveness. The model was developed from biblical-theological and psychological research done on the concepts of forgiveness and will demonstrate Christ-like love and heal their damaged emotions. Method The task of this project is to develop and implement a model of forgiveness that will present to seminar participants a biblical concept of forgiveness and how to forgive. Consequently, the participants will gain knowledge of a true biblical concept of forgiveness and, ultimately through coaching and practicing the concept of forgiveness, a healing process may begin in their lives. Twenty Seventh-day Adventist adults over 18 years old of the Belleville Seventh- day Adventist Church, Ontario, Canada participated in the study through the five sessions of a ten-hour seminar, and also participated in a three-month coaching by the researcher. Exposure to the model of forgiveness came through a seminar including small group lectures, group interactions, printed material, and personal assignments. Results Surveys confirmed the effectiveness of the model in helping participants experience progress in giving forgiveness to their opponents. The surveys also provided evidence of the model’s success in correcting participants’ erroneous views and misconceptions about forgiveness. Conclusion The seminar was successful to a certain degree of the goal of this project which was to change the members from holding an incorrect view of forgiveness to a correct biblical view. A significant difference in the understanding of forgiveness was shown among the participants at the end of the project; especially the inaccurate view of forgiveness was somewhat corrected. Consequently, this research project offered additional insights into the use of forgiveness in the joyous experience of salvation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".