MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954508249 · doi:10.32597/dmin/555

A Model of Forgiveness: Development and Implementation at the Belleville Seventh-day Adventist Church, Ontario, Canada

2011· dissertation· en· W2954508249 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sereivudh Ly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicForgiveness and Related Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForgivenessSeventh day adventistTheologyChristian ChurchPsychologySociologyPhilosophyChristianity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem In the Belleville Seventh-day Adventist Church, many attendees have incorrect views about forgiveness that have created many personal and relational problems inside and outside the church. Thus, the church needs a biblical and practical model of forgiveness. The model was developed from biblical-theological and psychological research done on the concepts of forgiveness and will demonstrate Christ-like love and heal their damaged emotions. Method The task of this project is to develop and implement a model of forgiveness that will present to seminar participants a biblical concept of forgiveness and how to forgive. Consequently, the participants will gain knowledge of a true biblical concept of forgiveness and, ultimately through coaching and practicing the concept of forgiveness, a healing process may begin in their lives. Twenty Seventh-day Adventist adults over 18 years old of the Belleville Seventh- day Adventist Church, Ontario, Canada participated in the study through the five sessions of a ten-hour seminar, and also participated in a three-month coaching by the researcher. Exposure to the model of forgiveness came through a seminar including small group lectures, group interactions, printed material, and personal assignments. Results Surveys confirmed the effectiveness of the model in helping participants experience progress in giving forgiveness to their opponents. The surveys also provided evidence of the model’s success in correcting participants’ erroneous views and misconceptions about forgiveness. Conclusion The seminar was successful to a certain degree of the goal of this project which was to change the members from holding an incorrect view of forgiveness to a correct biblical view. A significant difference in the understanding of forgiveness was shown among the participants at the end of the project; especially the inaccurate view of forgiveness was somewhat corrected. Consequently, this research project offered additional insights into the use of forgiveness in the joyous experience of salvation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForgiveness and Related BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207