Preparation and electrochemical performance of uniform RuO<sub>2</sub>/Ti and RuO<sub>2</sub>‐IrO<sub>2</sub>/Ti electrode for electrolysis of NaCl solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical preparation of NaClO has been widely used for the production of industrial disinfectant. To reduce the cost of electrode preparation using the brushing method, this paper introduces a method for the electrodeposition for RuO2/Ti and RuO2‐IrO2/Ti preparation and NaCl solution electrolysis. The deposition of Ir improves the uniformity and stability of the RuO2/Ti electrode. The optimum preparation conditions and additive concentrations were investigated in detail through the orthogonal experiment. By adjusting the electroplating time, temperature and voltage, the electrode with a high content of available chlorine was synthesized successfully. The physicochemical properties of the as‐prepared RuO2/Ti and RuO2‐IrO2/Ti were determined by XRD, SEM‐EDS, and XPS, and the electrochemical performance and lifetime of the RuO2/Ti and RuO2‐IrO2/Ti was verified via an electrochemical workstation. Uniform and stable RuO2/TiO2 and RuO2‐IrO2/TiO2 were synthesized successfully for the electrolysis of the NaCl solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".