MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954689167 · doi:10.1089/cmb.2017.0063

Two-Exponential Models of Gene Expression Patterns for Noisy Experimental Data

2018· article· en· W2954689167 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Biology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)SegmentationMessenger RNADrosophila embryogenesisEmbryoDevelopmental biologyPattern recognition (psychology)Translation (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial pattern formation of the primary anterior-posterior morphogenetic gradient of the transcription factor Bicoid (Bcd) has been studied experimentally and computationally for many years. Bcd specifies positional information for the downstream segmentation genes, affecting the fly body plan. More recently, a number of researchers have focused on the patterning dynamics of the underlying bcd messenger RNA (mRNA) gradient, which is translated into Bcd protein. New, more accurate techniques for visualizing bcd mRNA need to be combined with quantitative signal extraction techniques to reconstruct the bcd mRNA distribution. Here, we present a robust technique for quantifying gradients with a two-exponential model. This approach (1) has natural, biologically relevant parameters and (2) is invariant to linear transformations of the data arising due to variation in experimental conditions (e.g., microscope settings, nonspecific background signal). This allows us to quantify bcd mRNA gradient variability from embryo to embryo (important for studying the robustness of developmental regulatory networks); sort out atypical gradients; and classify embryos to developmental stage by quantitative gradient parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational BiologySame topicDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationFrench-language works237,207