ФОРМИРОВАНИЕ КОМПЛЕКСНЫХ НАЗЕМНЫХ БЕСПОЗВОНОЧНЫХ НА ВЫРУБКА В ТЕМНОХВОЙНЫХ НАСАЖДЕНИЯХ ЕНИСЕЙСКОГО КРЯЖА
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ISSN: 0024-1148 Russian Journal of Forest Science. 2015, No. 2, pp. 147-153 DEVELOPMENT OF LAND INVERTEBRATES ASSOCIATIONS ON CUTTINGS OF DARK CONIFEROUS STANDS IN YENISEI RIDGE A. V. Gurov Forest Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Academgorodok 50 bldg. 28, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russia E-mail: gurov@ksc.krasn.ru Received 25 December 2012 We studied the composition and allocation of the forest floor arthropods and trophic activity of phyllophages in secondary young growth of silver birch replacing a cutting of dark coniferous forest in Yenisei ridge. Specifics of succession affect directly and indirectly the interaction of arthropods within and between the associations. Keywords: dark coniferous stand, cutting, succession stage, silver birch, herpetobion, phyllophage arthropods. REFERENCES Verzhutskii B.N., Vliyanie rubok na dinamiku zookompleksov temnokhvoinogo lesa (Priangar'e) (The effect of cuttings on the dynamics of zoocomplexes of dark coniferous forest (Priangar’t), In: Issledovaniya dinamiki taezhnykh ekosistem (Investigations of the dynamics of taiga ecosystems), Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskogo universiteta, 1977, pp. 58-74. Vladyshevskii D.V., Ekologiya lesnykh ptits i zverei (kormodobyvanie i ego biotsenoticheskoe znachenie) (The ecology of forest birds and animals (foraging and its biocoenotic significance)), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1980, 260 p. Gilyarov M.S., Uchet krupnykh bespozvonochnykh (mezofauna) (The registration of large invertebrates (mesofauna), In: Kolichestvennye metody v pochvennoi zoologii (Numerical methods in soil zoology), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 9-26. Gurov A.V., Babenko A.S., Raspredelenie kompleksov gerpetobiontnykh zhestkokrylykh (Soleoptera: Sarabidae; Staphylinidae) na granitse vyrubki smeshannogo temnokhvoinogo nasazhdeniya ravninnoi yuzhnoi taigi Srednei Sibiri (The distribution of the complexes of herbetobium coleopteran species (Coleoptera: Carabidae; Staphylinidae) on the border of the cutting of mixed dark coniferous forest of the plain southern taiga of Middle Siberia ), Fauna i ekologiya zhivotnykh Sibiri (Fauna and ecology of the animals of Siberia), Krasnoyarsk: Izd-vo Krasnoyarskogo gos. ped. universiteta , 2011, pp. 126-146. Gurov A.V., Petrenko N.M., Metody otsenki troficheskoi deyatel'nosti nasekomykh-fillofagov v lesnykh biogeotsenozakh (Methods for the estimation of trophic activity of phyllophagous insects in forest biogeocoenoses), Lesovedenie , 1988, No. 5, pp. 15-19. Gurov A.V., Gurova N.N., Battisti A., Gerpetobiontnye zhestkokrylye kak indikatory lesorastitel'nykh uslovii (Herpetobium coleopteran species as indicators of forest growing conditions), Ekologo-geograficheskie aspekty lesoobrazovatel'nogo protsessa (Ecological and Geogrephical Apsects of Forest developing Process), Proc. All Russian Conf., Krasnoyarsk. Krasnoyarsk.: Institut lesa im. V.N. Sukacheva SO RAN, 2009, pp. 370-373. Gurova N.N., Gurov A.V., Troficheskaya aktivnost' nasekomykh-fillofagov i morfometricheskie pokazateli listvy berezy povisloi v zone tekhnogennogo vozdeistviya Achinskogo neftepererabatyvayushchego kompleksa (The trophic activity of phyllophagous insects and the morphometric characters of common birch leaves in zone of technogenic effects of Achinsk refinery complex), Sokhranenie i vosproizvodstvo lesov kak vazhnogo sredoobrazuyushchego, klimatoreguliruyushchegofaktora (Preservation and Reproduction of Forests as the Important Factor of the Development of Environment and of the Regulation of Climate), Proc. Inter. Scientific and Practical Conf., Bishkek, Bishkek: Institut lesa im. P.A. Gana NAN KR, 2011. pp. 73-79. Korobov E. D., Osvoenie pochvennymi bespozvonochnymi narushennykh pochv v el'nikakh yuzhnoi taigi (The colonization of disturbed soils by invertebrates in the southern taiga spruce forests), Ekologiya , 1991, No. 1, pp. 90-92. Matveev V.A., Pochvennaya mezofauna slozhnykh el'nikov i vyrubok v Mariiskoi ASSR (The soil mesofauna of compound spruce forests and cuttings in Mariiskaya ASSR), Problemy pochvennoi zoologii (Problems of Soil Zoology), 1975, pp. 223-225., Proc. V th All-Union Meet., Vil'nyus, 1975, pp. 223-225. Perel' E.S., Pochvennoe naselenie el'nikov yuzhnoi taigi i ego izmenenie v svyazi s rubkoi lesa i pri smene porod (The soil populations of southern taiga spruce forests and its changes after cutting and tree species exchange), Pedobiologia , 1965, No. 5, pp. 102-121. Tikhomirova A.L., Uchet napochvennykh bespozvonochnykh bespozvonochnyh (The registration of upground invertebrates), In: Metody pochvenno-zoologicheskikh issledovani (Methods of soil zoological investigations), Moscow: Nauka, 1975, pp. 73-85. Altegrim O., Sjoberg K., Ball J.P., Forestry effects on a boreal ground beetle community in spring: Selective logging and clear-cutting compared, Entomol. Fennica ., 1997, No 8, pp. 19-26. Cherix D., Bourne J.D., A field study on a super-colony of the red wood ant Formica lugubris Zett. in relation to other predatory arthropods (spiders, harvestmen and ants), Rev. Swiss. Zool . 1980, Vol. 8, No 4, pp. 955-973. Gourov A., Godron M., Loshchev S., Overlap in distribution of forest and meadow insects species in mesoecotones. I. Epigeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Silphidae), Ecologie (France), 2000, Vol. 30, No 3, pp. 165-175. Gurov A.V., Petrenko N.M., Characteristics of leaf consumption by phyllophagous insects in young pine and deciduous forests, Lesovedenie, 1986, No 4, pp. 15-22. Heliola J., Koivula M., Niemela J., Distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across a boreal forest–clearcut ecotone, Conservation Biology , 2001, Vol. 15, No 2, pp. 370-377. Jennings D.N., Houseweart M.W., Dunn G.A., Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) associated with strip clearcut and dense spruce-fir forests of Maine, Coleopt. Bull ., 1986, No. 40, pp. 251-263. Lenski R.E., The impact of forest cutting on the diversity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the southern Appalachians, Ecol. Entomol ., 1982, Vol. 7, No 4, 385-390. Niemela J., Langor D., Spence J. R., Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Western Canada, Conservation Biology , 1993, No. 6, pp. 551-561. Niemela J., Haila Y., Halme E., Lahti N., Pajunen N., Punttila P., The distribution of carabid beetles in fragments of old coniferous taiga and adjacent managed forests, Ann. Zool. Fennici , 1988, No. 25, pp. 107-119. Obrtel R., Number of pitfall traps in relation to the structure of the catch of soil surface coleopteran, Acta Ent. Bohemoslov ., 1971, Vol. 68, pp. 300-309. Punttila P., Haila Y., Pajunen T., Tukia H., Colonisation of clearcut forests by ants in southern Finnish taiga: A quantitative survey, Oikos , 1991, Vol. 61, pp. 250-262. Spence J.R., Niemela J.K., Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and the method, Can. Ent ., 1994, Vol. 126, pp. 881-894. Thiele H.-U., Carabid beetles in their environments. A study of habitat selection by adaptations in physiology and behavior , Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1977, 369 p.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".