MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Impact of Isometric Handgrip Training on Cardiovascular Stress Reactivity: Does Baseline Psychological Stress Matter?

2019· article· en· W2954821319 on OpenAlexaff
Ellen McGarity‐Shipley, Morgan Silvester, Kaitlyn Liu, Sarah Bailey, Kyra E. Pyke

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseMedicinePhysical therapyInternal medicineBlood pressureTrier social stress testCardiologyFight-or-flight response

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular stress reactivity (CSR) is associated with cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and carotid intima media thickness. It may also be influenced by baseline perceived psychological stress. Isometric handgrip training (IHGT) has been shown to reduce CSR in hypertensive adults, however, the impact of IHGT on CSR in normotensive adults is unknown. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of IHGT on CSR in young, healthy males and to assess the potential influence of variability in baseline perceived stress across the intervention. METHODS: Young, healthy male subjects were randomly assigned to a control (n=11, 22±4 yrs) or IHGT group (n=11, 23±4 yrs). The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was administered and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was assessed during the Trier Social Stress Task. CSR was calculated as the difference in MAP from baseline to peak during stress. A single training session consisted of 4 alternating right and left 2 min isometric handgrip contractions (30% maximal voluntary contraction) and this was performed 5 days/week for 5 weeks. All measurements were performed before and after the intervention. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in CSR post-intervention (19±10 vs. 23±11 mmHg, p<0.02) however, this was not significantly different between groups (p=0.45). PSS score did not change with the intervention (14±7 vs. 13±6 p=0.56) or differ between groups (p=0.7). Overall, CSR did not correlate with PSS scores (r2= -0.03, p>0.2) and addition of the PSS score to CSR analysis did not alter the findings. However, there was a significant negative correlation between CSR and PSS scores of less than 15 (r2= -0.3, p<0.001). Addition of PSS score to CSR analysis in only these participants did not show a training reduction of CSR compared to the control group (28±3 vs. 19±3 mmHg; 20±3 vs. 18±3 mmHg, p=0.172). CONCLUSION: In contrast to some findings with aerobic training, IHGT did not lower CSR in young, healthy males. Lower responses overall post intervention suggest that some habituation to the TSST occurred. Although considering PSS score did not alter current findings, CSR decreased with increasing reported stress up to a moderate reported stress level (PSS score of 15). This suggests that considering baseline levels of stress may be helpful in interpreting CSR changes with exercise interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiac Health and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→