MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954898658 · doi:10.1016/j.crma.2019.05.009

Sparse approximate solutions to stochastic Galerkin equations

2019· article· fr· W2954898658 on OpenAlexafffund
Christophe Audouze, Prasanth B. Nair

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Mathématique · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMathematicsKrylov subspaceConjugate gradient methodDiscretizationConvergence (economics)Applied mathematicsSparse approximationPolynomialAlgorithmIterative methodMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this Note, we formulate a sparse Krylov-based algorithm for solving large-scale linear systems of algebraic equations arising from the discretization of randomly parametrized (or stochastic) elliptic partial differential equations (SPDEs). We analyze the proposed sparse conjugate gradient (CG) algorithm within the framework of inexact Krylov subspace methods, prove its convergence and study its abstract computational cost. Numerical studies conducted on stochastic diffusion models show that the proposed sparse CG algorithm outperforms the classical CG method when the sought solutions admit a sparse representation in a polynomial chaos basis. In such cases, the sparse CG algorithm recovers almost exactly the sparsity pattern of the exact solutions, which enables accelerated convergence. In the case when the SPDE solution does not admit a sparse representation, the convergence of the proposed algorithm is very similar to the classical CG method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComptes Rendus MathématiqueSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207