MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract CT014: Initial results from the Phase I study of MSC-1, a humanized anti-LIF monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2019· article· en· W2955033126 on OpenAlexaff
Alison M. Schram, Anna Spreafico, Marc Oliva, Irene Braña, Elena Garralda, Nehal J. Lakhani, Daniel D. Von Hoff, Erkut Borazanci, Naimish Pandya, Kimberly Hoffman, Robin Hallett, Patricia Giblin, Judit Anido, Adrianne Kelly, Robert Wasserman, Joan Seoane, Lillian L. Siu, David M. Hyman, Josep Tabernero

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreInterface Biologics (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTumor microenvironmentCancerMonoclonal antibodyImmunosuppressionMetastasisCytokine release syndromeCancer researchCytokineAntibodyOncologyImmunotherapyImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in many physiological and pathological processes. LIF is highly expressed in a subset of tumors across multiple solid tumor types and has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis. LIF is hypothesized to contribute to tumor growth and progression by acting on multiple aspects of cancer biology, including immunosuppression of the tumor microenvironment (TME), and regulation of cancer initiating cells (CICs), which are thought to underpin tumor growth, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. MSC-1 is a first-in-class humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that potently and selectively inhibits LIF. Blocking LIF with MSC-1 decreased tumor growth in multiple mouse tumor models, drove reprogramming of the TME through effects on immunosuppressive macrophages, and generated durable regressions when combined with anti-PD1. These findings form the basis of a robust therapeutic hypothesis, that MSC-1 treatment may lead to clinical activity in multiple cancer indications. Methods: The Phase 1 study of MSC-1 is enrolling patients with advanced relapsed/refractory solid tumors. The study employs an accelerated 3+3 escalation design to explore safety, PK, LIF peripheral target engagement, immuno-regulatory activity, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of MSC-1. Patients receive treatment with MSC-1 intravenously once every three-weeks until confirmed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. At the top three dose levels, the cohorts will be expanded to further assess safety, PK/target engagement, and to preliminarily assess MOA biomarkers in paired pre- and on treatment tumor tissue from patients. The Dose and Expanded Escalation will enroll patients without regard to their pretreatment LIF tumor levels. Results: As of January 28, 2019, dosing has occurred in 14 patients in the 5 preplanned Dose Escalation cohorts (225mg-1500mg) as well as in 15 patients in the expanded cohorts at 750mg and 1125mg doses for additional safety, PK/PD and biomarker analysis, including analysis of pretreatment and on treatment tumor biopsies in a subset. There have been no DLTs observed at any dose, and analysis of data to select a RP2D for Dose Expansion is ongoing. Citation Format: Alison Schram, Anna Spreafico, Marc Oliva, Irene Brana, Elena Garralda, Nehal Lakhani, Daniel Von Hoff, Erkut Borazanci, Naimish Pandya, Kimberly Hoffman, Robin Hallett, Patricia Giblin, Judit Anido, Adrianne Kelly, Robert Wasserman, Joan Seoane, Lillian Siu, David M. Hyman, Josep Tabernero. Initial results from the Phase I study of MSC-1, a humanized anti-LIF monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207