MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955127434 · doi:10.1029/2019tc005564

Assessing Quaternary Shortening Rates at an Andean Frontal Thrust (32°30′S), Argentina

2019· article· en· W2955127434 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos H. Costa, Lindsay M. Schoenbohm, B. A. Brooks, Carlos E. Gardini, Andrés D. Richard

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyUniversidad Nacional de San LuisNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyQuaternaryHoloceneThrustPaleontologyThrust faultTerrace (agriculture)GeomorphologyFault (geology)SeismologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract At the latitude of 32–33°S, the orogenic front of the eastern flank of the Andes is located in the Southern Precordillera, where two major thrusts concentrate Quaternary deformation at the surface. We estimate the shortening rate for one of these, the Las Peñas thrust, for the last ~200 ka, at the site of one of the best exposures of Quaternary thrusting along the Andes. Shortening was estimated across two prominent splays of the deformation zone at the mouth of the Las Peñas River through balanced cross‐sections by using a terrace surface as a marker of cumulative deformation. Terrace ages were constrained through cosmogenic isotopes ( 10 Be) analysis on quartz cobbles collected from the surface and three depth profiles. Results indicate a mean shortening rate across the Las Peñas thrust of 0.27 + 0.11 mm/a. Our results are lower than Holocene shortening rates (1.9–2.4 mm/a) obtained for individual splays of the Las Peñas thrust nearby. We discuss these discrepancies and implications for thrust evolution since the Late Pleistocene, in particular regarding along‐strike rate variations that highlight the complexity of the Quaternary‐active thrust deformation zone. We argue that ongoing stream incision rates largely prevail with respect to thrust activity at the study site. This observation might be connected with a recent (Holocene?) basinward shift of blind thrust activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonicsSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207